READ MORE - Waterfall-like rain eases in Japan, but 28 dead
There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that is less than the one you are capable of living
Waterfall-like rain eases in Japan, but 28 dead
READ MORE - Waterfall-like rain eases in Japan, but 28 dead
Tropical Storm Alberto hovers off Carolina coast
The first storm of the season that officially begins June 1 was not expected to approach landfall on the Carolinas' coast, but it prompted a tropical storm watch and forecasters warned that it could produce high winds, heavy surf, rip currents and scattered rain across the region.
"It's making the closest approach to the coastline now, so the impacts shouldn't be much different than what we are already seeing," said Jonathan Lamb, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Charleston, S.C.
At 2 p.m. Eastern, the National Hurricane Center said Alberto was about 110 miles (177 km) south of Charleston. It has maximum sustained winds of 45 mph (72 kph).
It's currently moving west-southwest at 6 mph (10 kph), but forecasters expect it to turn northeast sometime Monday.
A few rains bands from Alberto reached Hilton Head Island and Savannah, Ga., on Sunday but they moved through in less than an hour. Winds weren't expected to reach higher than 30 mph at the beaches, Lamb said. From Charleston to the north, even less of an impact was expected.
A tropical storm watch was in effect for the South Carolina coast from the Savannah River to the South Santee River. Forecasters don't expect tropical storm conditions to reach the coast, but issued the watch as a precaution because the forecast track of Alberto was still uncertain.
The hurricane center said the storm was expected to slow down through Sunday, then begin turning northeast and heading farther out to sea sometime Monday.
Alberto was named a tropical storm Saturday upon forming in the Atlantic. It was the third tropical storm to form before the official June 1 start of the hurricane season in the past 31 years.
Forecasters said there is no evidence that early-forming storms mean more tropical storms and hurricane for the rest of the season, especially with storms like Alberto that form from leftover weather fronts and low pressure systems moving off the mainland into the Atlantic.
"It's anomalous for sure, but there's really no indication this gives us any idea what the hurricane season is going to be like as a whole," Lamb said.
The brief bursts of wet weather and occasional gusty winds disrupted some vacation plans along the beaches of southern South Carolina and northern Georgia. Swimmers were warned of dangerous rip currents, although no rescues were reported. Boat operators canceled cruises both for the choppy seas and because concerned vacationers didn't want to go out with Alberto offshore.
"A lot of people are nervous about the weather, so we are getting cancelations," said Kate Myers, with Island Explorer Tours on Hilton Head.
The brief storms ended by Sunday morning and the sun was occasionally peeking through, so the captain that runs the afternoon cruise through the salt marshes hoped to take tourists on his scheduled run, Myers said.
"Having a storm out there this early is just strange," Myers said. "But it has been a weird year for weather." ( Associated Press )
READ MORE - Tropical Storm Alberto hovers off Carolina coast
More of US at risk to sea level rise
READ MORE - More of US at risk to sea level rise
Building collapses in center of Rio de Janeiro
Thick layers of debris covered cars and motorcycles. A neighboring building sustained serious damage, and television showed at least two people on its roof apparently awaiting help from firefighters.
There were differing reports about possible deaths.
A spokeswoman from the city's Civil Defense department said two people were confirmed dead, but officials from City Hall and the municipal health department later disputed that, saying no deaths had been confirmed by early Thursday. It was not clear how many people were injured.
Rescue worker remove a car after a building collapsed in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Wednesday Jan. 25, 2012. There is no official word on deaths, but Globo television cites unidentified Brazilian authorities as saying two bodies have been found so far. (AP Photo/Felipe Dana)
Searchers were still picking through the rubble hours after the collapse.
There was a strong smell of natural gas in the area, but Rio's mayor said there were doubts that a gas leak caused the accident.
"There apparently was not an explosion. The collapse occurred because of structural damages," he said. "I don't think there was a gas leak."
Witnesses had reported hearing a loud explosion-like sound just before the building fell, and a strong odor of gas hung over the scene.
It was not immediately clear how big the damaged buildings were. The one nearly destroyed was at least five stories high. It sat near Rio's historic Teatro Municipal and the Fine Arts Museum, both of which appeared undamaged.
The Civil Defense official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said she believed the collapsed building was for commercial use and not residential. The explosion happened after 8 p.m. and there were hopes that would minimize the number of people who might have been in the area.
Police cordoned off the area and electricity to the street was cut off for safety reasons. ( Associated Press )
Blog : The Challenge
Post : Building collapses in center of Rio de Janeiro
READ MORE - Building collapses in center of Rio de Janeiro
Film Lumpur Lapindo Diluncurkan
Film yang diproduksi oleh Immodicus SA dan Arizona State University School of Earth and Space Exploration itu diluncurkan pada Jumat (13/11) malam di Scottsdale, Arizona.
Peluncuran yang berlangsung di Hotel Mondrian itu dilanjutkan dengan diskusi panel oleh beberapa ahli geologi tentang fenomena lumpur panas yang mulai menyembur di lahan eksplorasi minyak dan gas PT Lapindo Brantas di Porong, Sidoarjo, Jawa Timur, pada 29 Mei 2006 itu.
"Mud Max" mengungkap berbagai fakta menyangkut kasus tersebut dari segi keilmuwan, ekonomi, kemanusiaan dan politik.
Dalam "Mud Max", dimunculkan pendapat bertentangan dari sejumlah ahli tentang penyebab munculnya lumpur, apakah kejadian alam atau kesalahan manusia.
Dalam diskusi panel, Juru Bicara Immodicus SA, Avian Tumengkol, mengatakan film Mud Max tidak diarahkan untuk menentukan apakah semburan lumpur itu merupakan bencana alam atau akibat dari kesalahan manusia.
"Film ini untuk memberi pemahaman, temuan-temuan dan pandangan-pandangan dari kedua pihak. Tujuan film ini adalah untuk memberi kesempatan kepada publik menentukan pemikiran dan pemahaman mereka sendiri untuk menyimpulkan mana yang benar," kata Avian.
Menurut Produser Eksekutif "Mud Max", Chris Fong, beberapa stasiun televisi asing telah menyatakan tertarik untuk memutar film berdurasi 47 menit itu.. "Metro TV di Indonesia juga menyatakan minatnya untuk menayangkan film ini," katanya.
Kontroversi adalah faktor utama yang membuat Chris Fong tertarik memproduksi film soal kasus lumpur Lapindo. "`Audience` akan tertarik dengan kontroversi...Saya lihat isu ini ternyata lebih rumit dan unsur politisnya demikian kuat," ujar Chris.
Permasalahan yang demikian rumit sempat membuat ia sendiri kehilangan kesabaran. "Saya benar-benar hampir menyerah karena sulit sekali mendapatkan jawaban-jawaban," cetusnya.
Namun, film tersebut akhirnya dapat diselesaikan setelah melewati berbagai riset selama satu tahun dan wawancara dengan berbagai sumber.
Komentar dan keterangan dirangkum dari berbagai pihak, termasuk dari para korban dampak luapan lumpur, pemerintah daerah, pihak PT Lapindo Brantas, Walhi dan BP Migas.
Beda Pendapat
Bagian itu juga mengungkapkan kecenderungan bahwa kontroversi soal Lumpur Lapindo akan terus berlanjut, demikian pula perbedaan pendapat di kalangan pakar tentang penyebab luapan lumpur di Sidoarjo.
"Mud Max" melaporkan bahwa simposium tentang lumpur Lapindo yang diadakan London Geological Society dan American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) Oktober 2008, misalnya, tidak dapat membuktikan pembenaran ilmiah tentang penyebab menyemburnya lumpur.
Sebelumnya menurut catatan media, simposium yang diadakan di Cape Town, Afrika Selatan, itu diakhiri dengan pemungutan suara karena pendapat-pendapat yang disampaikan para ahli tentang penyebab lumpur Lapindo sangat bertentangan.
Pemungutan suara yang diikuti oleh 74 ahli perminyakan dunia menunjukkan bahwa 42 ilmuwan mendukung teori bahwa pengeboran ladang Banjar Panji 1 di Sidoarjo yang dilakukan oleh Lapindo Brantas merupakan penyebab menyemburnya lumpur.
Tiga ilmuwan setuju dengan pendapat bahwa semburan lumpur pada 29 Mei 2006 itu disebabkan gempa bumi yang mengguncang Yogyakarta dua hari sebelumnya.
Enam belas ilmuwan menganggap bukti-bukti yang disampaikan para pakar pembicara tidak meyakinkan; dan 13 ilmuwan lainnya mendukung pendapat bahwa luapan lumpur merupakan kombinasi dampak dari terjadinya gempa bumi serta pengeboran di ladang eksplorasi.
Menurut Chris Fong, "Mud Max" dengan naskah versi Bahasa Indonesia akan diluncurkan di Indonesia pada Januari 2010. ( antara )
Post : Film Lumpur Lapindo Diluncurkan
READ MORE - Film Lumpur Lapindo Diluncurkan